https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831 --- Comment #35 from Gerald Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #34) > (In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #33) > > Antonio... ok, I have uploaded a revised spec. The tests aren't really > > designed for packaging, they are more for development. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs > > Please, post a new release with related SPEC/SRPM links after sec file > changing. > I didn't think that applied during the review process, but I'll do it going forward. > > This page describes how to run automatic test cases to see if the application > works properly. > https://github.com/hluk/CopyQ/wiki/Running-Tests > > It seems to me a good reason to do that in the RPM packaging. The tests require the program to be compiled with test flags on. qmake doesn't exist, that script would need to be patched. The actual running of tests, starts the copyq server. I'm using the application now... it is functioning properly. If you want me to post a .2 version of the spec before you review again I will, but the .1 version has the changes and is ready for your review. Thanks again! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review