[Bug 195647] Review Request: redland

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: redland


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647





------- Additional Comments From Kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-05-22 17:26 EST -------
IMHO, putting the headers in /usr/include:
1. is upstream's call to make,
2. doesn't violate any guidelines,
3. doesn't cause any real problems (see the next paragraph for why) and
4. can be easily changed in an update (if/when upstream changes it).
Therefore, I don't see this as a good reason to block the review.

Moreover, looking at the actual names of the headers, the only ones which don't 
have an rdf_* prefix are librdf.h and redland.h, both of which have practically 
zero chance to conflict with another package (redland being the project name 
and librdf being the name of the shared object it ships), making this a 
strictly academic issue.

Therefore, please don't let this hold back this package. If you really can't 
get over yourself to approve it without this change, I will.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]