https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831 --- Comment #27 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #26) > Antonio, Thanks for the quick and detailed response. The icon-cache issue > was a result of me mis-interpreting the instructions in comment 3. I'm > currently applying all of your recommendations. > > I do have a comment regarding the error: > > If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in > its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package is included in %doc. > Note: Cannot find LICENSE in rpm(s) > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > > You had mentioned that earlier and pointed me to the guidelines which said > that now the license should be in %license. However the error above is > saying that it needs to be in %doc. I'm assuming that %license is correct > and the %doc error is wrong and is to be ignored. > > Can you please clarify? Thanks! It's a false positive from fedora-review checks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127916 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review