https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- > spdlog-0-3.20150410git.211ce99.fc20.src.rpm One dot too much after "git": https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages > %files > %doc README.md > %license LICENSE It makes no sense to create a base package which includes only these two files. It will never be installed by anything other than the -devel package. Note that you can omit the %files section for the base package in order to build no base package. The license file can be included in the -devel package instead: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing > %description devel > The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for > developing applications that use %{name}. That's a bit half-hearted. Assume it's called a "header-only library", then "libraries and headers" is one too much. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review