https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207938 --- Comment #1 from Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Summary: - a few source files are missing license - there is no seperate license file - there is an obsolete automake macro - %{?_smp_mflags} missing - rpmlint E: library-without-ldconfig-postin Probably fine: - no %check - no excludearch Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues: ======= - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/virgl See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles - Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in virglrenderer See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 17 files have unknown license: It's probably worth to add license in the following files: src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_atomic.h src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_box.h src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_dual_blend.h src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_format_etc.c src/gallium/include/pipe/p_config.h src/virgl_hw.h src/virgl_protocol.h src/virtgpu_hw.h tests/testvirgl_encode.c tests/testvirgl_encode.h vtest/vtest.h vtest/vtest_protocol.h vtest/vtest_renderer.c vtest/vtest_server.c [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [?]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [?]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Why not? [x]: Final provides and requires are sane. [?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in virglrenderer-devel , virglrenderer-test-server [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?]: %check is present and all tests pass. It's probably not that reliable to enable it on build [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: virglrenderer-0.1-0.20150401gita9ba2c442.fc21.x86_64.rpm virglrenderer-devel-0.1-0.20150401gita9ba2c442.fc21.x86_64.rpm virglrenderer-test-server-0.1-0.20150401gita9ba2c442.fc21.x86_64.rpm virglrenderer-0.1-0.20150401gita9ba2c442.fc21.src.rpm virglrenderer.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Virgl -> Virgil, Virgo, Viral virglrenderer.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Virgl Rendering library. virglrenderer.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US qemu -> emu, q emu virglrenderer.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US virtio -> virtuoso virglrenderer.x86_64: W: no-url-tag virglrenderer.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libvirglrenderer.so.0.1.0 virglrenderer.x86_64: W: no-documentation virglrenderer.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libvirglrenderer.so.0.1.0 virglrenderer.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libvirglrenderer.so.0.1.0 virglrenderer-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on virglrenderer/virglrenderer-libs/libvirglrenderer virglrenderer-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) renderer -> tenderer, rendered, render er virglrenderer-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US renderer -> tenderer, rendered, render er virglrenderer-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US qemu -> emu, q emu virglrenderer-devel.x86_64: W: no-url-tag virglrenderer-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib virglrenderer-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation virglrenderer-test-server.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) renderer -> tenderer, rendered, render er virglrenderer-test-server.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US renderer -> tenderer, rendered, render er virglrenderer-test-server.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US virgl -> viral, Virgil virglrenderer-test-server.x86_64: W: no-url-tag virglrenderer-test-server.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/virgl_test_server virglrenderer-test-server.x86_64: W: no-documentation virglrenderer-test-server.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary virgl_test_server virglrenderer.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Virgl -> Virgil, Virgo, Viral virglrenderer.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Virgl Rendering library. virglrenderer.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US qemu -> emu, q emu virglrenderer.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US virtio -> virtuoso virglrenderer.src: W: no-url-tag virglrenderer.src: W: invalid-url Source0: virglrenderer-20150401.tar.xz 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 27 warnings. AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found ------------------------------ AC_PROG_LIBTOOL found in: virglrenderer-20150401/configure.ac:23 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1207938 Buildroot used: fedora-21-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review