https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832804 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4) > Issues > ======= > It seems that fedora-review is badly confused here for some reason. I'm > leaving its comments for reference. > > - Package installs properly. > Note: Installation errors (see attachment) > See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines > > It does install properly, when #832803 is installed. > > - Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils > > They seem to have. > > - POM files have correct Maven mapping > Note: Old style Maven package found, no add_maven_depmap calls found but > POM > files present > See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#add_maven_depmap_macro > > %mvn_install is used, so things seem fine. > > - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in > its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package is included in %doc. > Note: Cannot find LICENSE.txt in rpm(s) > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > > Bogus. > > Things look kosher, only the license is unclear. Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/axion.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/axion-1.0-2.fc20.src.rpm - fix license field -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review