https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210990 Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- $ rpmlint qt5-qtwebchannel qt5-qtwebchannel-devel qt5-qtwebchannel.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.4.0-1 ['5.4.1-1.fc22', '5.4.1-1'] qt5-qtwebchannel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libQt5WebChannel.so.5.4.1 /lib64/libQt5Network.so.5 qt5-qtwebchannel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libQt5WebChannel.so.5.4.1 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 qt5-qtwebchannel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libQt5WebChannel.so.5.4.1 /lib64/libm.so.6 qt5-qtwebchannel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libQt5WebChannel.so.5.4.1 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 qt5-qtwebchannel-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib qt5-qtwebchannel-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. mostly harmless naming: ok, matches standard naming of other qt5- modules in distro license: ok sources: ok $ md5sum *.xz bb914134c164c6758a0074748cc678ff qtwebchannel-opensource-src-5.4.1.tar.xz builds/installs: ok macros: ok scriptlet: ok looks like the qt5-qtwebsocket build dependency is optional and only for some examples, but using it here is mostly harmless. Probably worth adding a .spec comment about this, in case it helps bootstrapping new archs. Otherwise, thanks, looks good, APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review