https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826 --- Comment #3 from Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I imported your SRPM into a Git repo so it's clearer. Here's how I recommend handling the tests: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/rubygem-pathspec.git/commit/?id=2957c1fb52216a43e9b6fc94d4fd7d02cf6738d8 I use a small shell script (rubygem-pathspec-generate-tarball.sh) to download the upstream source zipfile from a GitHub tag, then strip down that zipfile so it only contains the tests. At that point, %setup can decompress Source2 so that it appears to be part of the tree. To fix this upstream, I've submitted https://github.com/highb/pathspec-ruby/pull/4 Ruby's RSpec library has made some API breaks between 2.x and 3.x, so I've also updated the .spec there to handle both APIs depending on the %{fedora} version. This allows the package to build on Fedora 21, 22, and 23. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review