[Bug 1190269] Review Request: openstack-barbican - Secrets as a Service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269

Greg Swift <gregswift@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(karlthered@gmail.
                   |                            |com)



--- Comment #6 from Greg Swift <gregswift@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Haïkel Guémar from comment #5)
> The main difference is likely to be that I used mock to rebuild the package
> so in a minimal chrooted environment.
I had built it in a mock environment (specifically via a local mockchain as
well as in copr). I thought i had run installs off of it. Looking back now that
package is not clean, so i'm not sure what happened with that testing. I should
have realized this when asking the question before. Sorry.

> Remains few issues reported by rpmlint.
> * Summary of python-barbican ends with a dot, drop it
done
> * logrotate file should be marked as %config
done
> * why barbican-api.conf is in openstack-barbican-worker subpackage ?
the worker uses this config file right now.  refactoring to where it just
requires the -api. which is annoying but less obtuse.
> * I would create a barbican-api subpackage
done, but still leaves barbican-api.conf in worker subpackage until they can
separate that out.
> * the pbr patch is still there but not needed since there's a requirement on
> pbr
you said post-juno. Its still there, for juno. There are several juno specific
bits in there.  When one part goes, it all does.
> * no version in changelog.
done

URL for the item in my git repo:
https://github.com/gregswift/barbican-spec/blob/juno/openstack-barbican.spec

Updated info:
Spec URL: http://nytefyre.net/rpms/openstack-barbican.spec
SRPM URL: http://nytefyre.net/rpms/openstack-barbican-2014.2-3.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]