https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208904 --- Comment #3 from Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #2) > Hi Colin, would you be ok with me renaming this to simply > "jenkins-job-builder" ? I noticed dcaro's package was named this way, and I > think it makes more sense. This actually leads to a question I had - right now this package includes both a Python library *and* a binary. Are there any other packages that might depend on the library code? If not, that would argue for moving the library into a private directory (e.g. /usr/lib/jenkins-job-builder), and setting PYTHONPATH (or changing sys.path) inside the binary script. I realize this approach isn't common among Python programs, but I believe that making a shared library shouldn't be the default - only libraries which are "stable" should be public. > If you indicate your approval for this change, I'll rename the bug title and > put in the SCM admin request. The above all said...I'm not opposed to a rename. You'll find Python packages whose primary interface is an executable in Fedora that go both ways. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review