https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208738 --- Comment #7 from Taylor Braun-Jones <taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Looking into the details of vera++, the Fedora Tcl guidelines, and the %{name}-plugins subpackage option: * A tcl-%{name} package does not apply because vera++ includes a build-in Tcl interpretter. * I'm not sure a %{name}-plugins subpackage makes sense either because the out-of-the-box expected behavior is to be able to run a default set of checks and transformations be simply running `vera++ foo.cpp` I've updated the spec and srpm links with the latest fixes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review