[Bug 1207946] Review Request: javawriter - A Java API for generating .java source files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207946



--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #4)

> 
> - Are you really sure to rename this package in Fedora to javawriter in
> contrast to the upstream name javapoet? How can it be found with the classic
> name as guessed from upstream? Okay, I can see the recent github releases
> are named javawriter. Maybe we should use the younger fork of google.

> [?]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
> 

the library was originally appointed javawriter and recently has been renamed
javapoet. the two libraries are incompatible. the fork of google dagger
(https://github.com/google/dagger) uses as you said their fork javawriter ...
for me ... a crap ... until i prefer to use the original (Square) release
for me there aren't contrast with upstream

> > Square's Javawriter
> > This is a fork of Square's Javapoet intended as a staging ground for changes
> > originating from inside google. While it may vary from Square's, the intention 
> > is that all changes end up merged into to Square's repository, and that this
> > fork will only vary temporarily while change is in process. Generally, unless 
> > you are depending on features not yet merged you should depend on square's 
> > version. We have no plans to do releases, though this fork will publish 
> > snapshots on successful merges.
> https://github.com/google/javapoet/blob/master/README.md
For now i prefer use the Square library and not have 

> - Include also %doc CONTRIBUTING.md into %files cause this file tells to
> sign a special contract about copyright etc. to be allowed for contribution
> at upstream.

Done

> Maven:
> [?]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
>      when building with ant
> 
> ==> Can not check magical maven logic.

listed in .mfiles*

> [?]: %check is present and all tests pass.
> 
> ==> Could those test/**/*Test.java files be used to run a short test? Why is
> it broken?
The all test suite use fest-assert-core:2.0M8 and i tried to remove some files
but at the end not have one valid *Test.java file for this scope
> > # Unavailable test deps: org.easytesting:fest-assert-core:2.0M8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]