https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304 Patrick Laimbock <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(patrick@laimbock. | |com) | --- Comment #140 from Patrick Laimbock <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Steve Jenkins from comment #133) > (In reply to Patrick Laimbock from comment #27) > > Changelog from the spec file for easier browsing: > > - add policycoreutils{-python} to Requires for semanage in post > > policycoreutils-python isn't available in EL5 (though policycoreutils is). > Not knowing a lot about it, is this package truly required for opendmarc to > function properly? The policycoreutils (on EL5) and policycoreutils-python (on EL6/EL7) packages contain "semanage" which was needed to set the proper SELinux labels in %post. A while back I filed a BZ regarding SELinux and OpenDMARC on EL6 and it was resolved: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983551 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1598.html I did some digging and AFAICT EL5 does not have OpenDMARC support in the milter.pp policy while EL6 and EL7 do. > Both policycoreutils and policycoreutils-python seem to be available in all > current Fedora builds, as well as EL6 and EL7, so is it worth conditionally > including for those builds only? It seems the semanage code in %post is still required for EL5 so how about leaving the "Requires: policycoreutils" and associated code in %post in within an if-its-EL5 condition and remove the policycoreutils-python requirement? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review