https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269 --- Comment #3 from Haïkel Guémar <karlthered@xxxxxxxxx> --- Sorry for the delay: 1. python-barbican contains no python modules, that's due to missing BuildRequires. By adding oslo stuff, I was able to fix that issue. https://github.com/openstack/barbican/blob/stable/juno/requirements.txt => blocker as it prevents barbican to be built properly in a chrooted env. 2. use python versioned macros %{__python2} and %{__python2_sitelib} For EL6, here's a fallback macro %if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} <= 6 %{!?__python2: %global __python2 /usr/bin/python2} %{!?python2_sitelib: %global python2_sitelib %(%{__python2} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib())")} %{!?python2_sitearch: %global python2_sitearch %(%{__python2} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1))")} %endif 3.we are dropping PBR patches starting kilo, so you may just drop it too and add Requires: python-pbr to python-barbican 4.drop the %clean section not required for EL6+ and supported Fedora 5. drop the %defattr, RPM has sensible defaults for EL6+ 6.minor but I would prefer using an openstack url rather than the cloudkeep one Please fix and set me in the needinfo flag when you're done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review