https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197505 --- Comment #4 from Ross Lagerwall <rosslagerwall@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ross Lagerwall from comment #2) > Thanks for the review! > > (In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment > #1) > > > License: LGPLv2+ > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Licensing > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > > > > Upstream ought to include the LGPL terms, especially since the documentation > > (in file COPYING) refers to both the LGPL and the GPL v3 for the examples. > > OK. I've set the main package's license to LGPLv2+ and BSD since this is > more accurate and also included COPYING in the package. I've sent a pull > request so that upstream includes the license terms: > https://github.com/sahlberg/libnfs/pull/114 > This has now been fixed upstream (but not in the current released version). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review