Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx 2007-05-19 01:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The package builds fine; rpmlint says: > W: corkscrew summary-ended-with-dot Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. > Should be a trivial fix. Fixed. > Note that Source0: should be a URL, so that spectool, for example, can download > the source. Fixed. > You must include the license text (COPYING) and really should include the rest > of the included documentation (AUTHORS, ChangeLog, TODO) as %doc. Done. > Have you investigated how other distros package this program? Debian includes a > manpage and a couple of bugfix patches. I have imported the online manual page, and some modifications to README and corkscrew.c from Debian. I have also put in a patch for a typo in README. > Finally, are you sponsored? A quick search didn't turn you up as the owner of > any other packages. If you don't have a sponsor, you'll need to add > FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the "Bug 239901 blocks" field and point out reviews that > you've done or other packages you've submitted so that the sponsors will have > enough information to decide whether they would like to sponsor you. No. I am not sponsored and have not yet reviewed any packages for Fedora since I am very new to packaging myself. My involvement with Fedora till now has been in the form of bug reports and a successful Summer of Code proposal (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SummerOfCode/2007/DebarshiRay). Apart from Fedora I contribute to GNU too. NB: The modified SRPM and SPEC file are available at the links mentioned in the initial review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review