https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205194 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- $ rpmlint mingw-libepoxy.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw-libepoxy-1.2-2.fc22.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-libepoxy-1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm mingw64-libepoxy-1.2-2.fc22.noarch.rpm mingw32-libepoxy.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-libepoxy.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpm --query --requires mingw32-libepoxy mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-crt mingw32-filesystem >= 95 mingw32-pkg-config rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --requires mingw64-libepoxy mingw64(kernel32.dll) mingw64(msvcrt.dll) mingw64-crt mingw64-filesystem >= 95 mingw64-pkg-config rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 $ rpm --query --provides mingw32-libepoxy mingw32(libepoxy-0.dll) mingw32-libepoxy = 1.2-2.fc22 $ rpm --query --provides mingw64-libepoxy mingw64(libepoxy-0.dll) mingw64-libepoxy = 1.2-2.fc22 $ wget --quiet https://github.com/anholt/libepoxy/archive/v1.2/libepoxy-1.2.tar.gz -O - | md5sum 12d6b7621f086c0c928887c27d90bc30 - $ md5sum libepoxy-1.2.tar.gz 12d6b7621f086c0c928887c27d90bc30 libepoxy-1.2.tar.gz + OK ! Needs to be looked into / Not applicable [+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines [+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-' [+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header} [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file [+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages [+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch [+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section [+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, or %mingw_cmake_kde4 to configure the package [+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package [+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package [/] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used [+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated [+] Libtool .la files are not bundled [+] .def files are not bundled [+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled [+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal [+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal The rpmlint warning can be avoided by adding %doc README.md to both subpackages but this is a minor issue ====================================================== The package mingw-libepoxy is APPROVED by epienbro ====================================================== -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review