https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199567 --- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> --- As for the need for license text as described and linked in comment #10: this review took place before the guidelines was changed [1]. At the point of that review, guidelines required license text to be part of %doc (and there was no %license tag). However, the guidelines changed by February, 15 2015 [1]. After this change, the license text should (only) go to %license, and not %doc. Is this the root of this confusion? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ALicensingGuidelines&diff=400807&oldid=323319 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review