[Bug 1203476] Review Request: sslh - Applicative protocol(SSL/SSH) multiplexer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476



--- Comment #6 from James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
> (In reply to James Hogarth from comment #4)
> > Apologies if you feel I 'stole' this from you or something but with all due
> > respect the bug you had open:
> > 
> > 1) Last update from you was this time last year.
> > 2) The spec and srpm files had not been accessible for some time.
> > 3) I had commented on your bug (which would have sent you mail) September
> > last year.
> > 4) Your reviewer had commented on your bug November last year.
> > 5) Since there was no response and the domain for your site listed is not
> > even a valid domain any more (NXDOMAIN) both your reviewer and I felt that
> > you were no longer interested in this.
> 
> I actually have lots of domains in my hand, but I often change the one I use.
> 
> I'm still interested in this, in 1.16, upstream didn't include GPL license
> text, and then I waited for months to see the import of the text, you could
> check the github issues page of sslh.
> 

I did... That was resolved July last year.

https://github.com/yrutschle/sslh/issues/23

> > I would be happy to co-maintain this if you are interested in taking it up
> > again as that would be a nice way to become a Fedora package maintainer -
> > although this is a small enough package that I believe I can handle Fedora
> > maintenance of it sufficiently if you prefer not to assist.
> 
> Ok, I believe I can finish this, I hope I can submit it again. Meanwhile I
> hope you can be a packager as well by submit other packages.

Well I'd appreciate your help with this but given the effort I've already put
in I'm not prepared to step away entirely so if you won't work with me I'd
kindly ask you to abide by the packaging guidelines and not to submit a review
request for a package with an active bug where the reporter is responding.

I believe I took the appropriate steps after commenting on your bug, your
reviewer commenting on your bug and asking advice in #fedora-devel which I then
followed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]