https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175952 --- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> --- Ok, there's a problem with the cmake package in rawhide right now so I'm re-running fedora-review with f22 instead. While it's running I have some feedback: Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines This is due to the cmake problem in rawhide, ignore for now. - Permissions on files are set properly. Note: See rpmlint output See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel This package does not BR python at all. I haven't looked through the packaged files but I have to assume that it's finding some python files? - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. Note: Cannot find COPYING.BSD in rpm(s) See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text Generic: [!]: update-mime-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package stores mime configuration in /usr/share/mime/packages. Note: mimeinfo files in: efl See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/ethumb(ethumb), /usr/share/edje(edje-devel), /usr/lib64/ecore(ecore), /usr/lib64/evas/modules/engines(evas), /usr/lib64/efreet(efreet), /usr/include/ethumb-1(ethumb-devel), /usr/lib64/evas/modules/engines/wayland_shm(evas), /usr/include/eet-1 (eet-devel), /usr/lib64/evas/modules/engines/fb(evas), /usr/share/evas(evas), /usr/lib64/evas/cserve2(evas), /usr/include/eio-1 (eio-devel), /usr/include/ecore-1(ecore-devel), /usr/include/edje-1(edje- devel), /usr/include/eeze-1(eeze-devel), /usr/lib64/ethumb(ethumb), /usr/include/eina-1/eina(libeina-devel), /usr/lib64/emotion(emotion), /usr/include/eina-1(libeina-devel), /usr/lib64/evas/modules/engines/software_x11(evas), /usr/share/edje/include(edje-devel), /usr/include/efreet-1(efreet-devel), /usr/include/evas-1(evas-devel), /usr/lib64/edje(edje, emotion), /usr/lib64/evas/modules(evas), /usr/lib64/evas(evas), /usr/lib64/evas/modules/engines/gl_x11(evas), /usr/include/emotion-1 (emotion-devel), /usr/share/emotion(emotion), /usr/lib64/edje/modules(emotion), /usr/lib64/edje/modules/emotion(emotion), /usr/lib64/edje/utils(edje) Is this somehow causes by getting rid of all the sub-packages? Rpmlint ------- Checking: efl-1.13.1-5.fc23.x86_64.rpm efl-devel-1.13.1-5.fc23.x86_64.rpm efl-1.13.1-5.fc23.src.rpm efl.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libecore_x.so.1.13.1 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 efl.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/eeze_scanner root 04555L I'm assuming eeze needs setuid? efl.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/eeze_scanner 04555L efl.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/eeze_scanner 04555L Needed? efl-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libeo.so.1.13.1-gdb.py efl-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libeo.so.1.13.1-gdb.py efl-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libeo.so.1.13.1-gdb.pyc efl-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libeo.so.1.13.1-gdb.pyc efl-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libeo.so.1.13.1-gdb.pyo efl-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/libeo.so.1.13.1-gdb.pyo I'm assuming this is what's causing the python errors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review