https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203476 --- Comment #4 from James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3) > Well, > > On this sslh review, have you ever contacted me before pushing it out? > > I don't care if someone wants to take over my original request, but you at > least should let me know, especially a "NEED_SPONSOR" guy, you should at > least send me a email, even though I may not reply to it. > > I've read all emails from every bugzilla as soon as it reaches my inbox. > None from you so far. > > Anyway, feel free to take it because you are already here. Apologies if you feel I 'stole' this from you or something but with all due respect the bug you had open: 1) Last update from you was this time last year. 2) The spec and srpm files had not been accessible for some time. 3) I had commented on your bug (which would have sent you mail) September last year. 4) Your reviewer had commented on your bug November last year. 5) Since there was no response and the domain for your site listed is not even a valid domain any more (NXDOMAIN) both your reviewer and I felt that you were no longer interested in this. I would be happy to co-maintain this if you are interested in taking it up again as that would be a nice way to become a Fedora package maintainer - although this is a small enough package that I believe I can handle Fedora maintenance of it sufficiently if you prefer not to assist. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review