[Bug 1199567] Review Request: ExchangeIR - Java infrared signals analysis and conversion library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199567



--- Comment #13 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> ---
If you havn't sent that question yet (no harm if you have): I can't really see
how the reference in comment #10 affects this. Here is nothing in the
changelog, and the package does not use the new %license tag.

Looking at the review of the same package in bug #987472 I still cannot see
that the reviewer has made any notes about using both %doc and %license.
However, I can see the same reviewer making his own packages only using
%license in bug #1193210  and also approving packages only using %license in
bug #1200762 (which BTW is packaged by Mikolaj Izdebski, one of the key players
in the java SIG)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]