[Bug 1202379] Review Request: fwupd - Firmware update daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202379



--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Fedora review fwupd-0.1.0-1.fc21.src.rpm 2015-03-16

+ OK
! needs attention

+ rpmlint warnings are harmless and can be ignored
+ The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the base package name.
! The package meets the Packaging Guidelines

  Some questions below about systemd macro use.

+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
  Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
! The license text (COPYING) is included in %license

  Can you use %license COPYING instead of %doc COPYING please?

+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match the sources in the srpm
  57e840121eafe4eb5510b9e8de274423  fwupd-0.1.0.tar.xz
  57e840121eafe4eb5510b9e8de274423  Download/fwupd-0.1.0.tar.xz
+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
+ locale handling
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all the directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect the runtime of application
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Development files should be in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a Proper .desktop file handling
+ Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8


According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd
, should also have:

Requires(post): systemd
Requires(preun): systemd
Requires(postun): systemd

... to make sure rpm orders the transactions so that systemd gets installed
before fwupd.

Another question is if it should have %systemd_postun or
%systemd_postun_with_restart in %post? I don't know the answer to that, but it
probably depends on whether it is safe to restart the daemon during package
upgrades?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]