Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-17 07:31 EST ------- Forgot links to new SRPM, Spec. But, rpmlint gives: W: nagi invalid-license X11 The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Academic Free License", "Adaptive Public License", "Apache License", "Apache Software License", "Apple Public Source License", "Artistic", "Attribution Assurance License", "BSD", "Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License", "CDDL", "CPL", "CUA Office Public License", "EU DataGrid Software License", "Eclipse Public License", "Educational Community License", "Eiffel Forum License", "Entessa Public License", "Fair License", "Frameworx License", "GPL", "LGPL", "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer", "IBM Public License", "Intel Open Source License", "Jabber Open Source License", "Lucent Public License", "MIT", "CVW License", "Motosoto License", "MPL", "NASA Open Source Agreement", "Naumen Public License", "Nethack General Public License", "Nokia Open Source License", "OCLC Research Public License", "Open Group Test Suite License", "Open Software License", "PHP License", "Python license", "Python Software Foundation License", "QPL", "RealNetworks Public Source License", "Reciprocal Public License", "Ricoh Source Code Public License", "Sleepycat License", "Sun Industry Standards Source License", "Sun Public License", "Sybase Open Watcom Public License", "University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License", "Vovida Software License", "W3C License", "wxWindows Library License", "X.Net License", "Zope Public License", "zlib/libpng License", "Creative Commons Attribution", "Creative Commons Attribution- NoDerivs", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial", "Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike", "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike", "Design Public License", "GFDL", "LaTeX Project Public License", "OpenContent License", "Open Publication License", "Public Domain", "Ruby License", "SIL Open Font License", "Charityware", "Commercial", "Distributable", "Freeware", "Non-distributable", "Proprietary", "Shareware", "Redistributable, no modification permitted". If the license is close to an existing one, you can use '<license> style'. Which one should I use? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review