https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191498 Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #4 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Yaniv, Keep increasing the release/changelog for every change in the spec. Please also check the output of fedora-review tool. $ fedora-review -b 1191498 Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed <snip> ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). <snip> Rpmlint ------- Checking: safelease-1.0-3.fc20.x86_64.rpm safelease-1.0-3.fc20.src.rpm safelease.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.ovirt.org/Safelease timed out safelease.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.ovirt.org/Safelease timed out 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review