https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200384 Tomas Heinrich <theinric@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |theinric@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Tomas Heinrich <theinric@xxxxxxxxxx> --- rpmlint: (rpmlint-1.6-2.fc22.noarch) > rpms/x86_64/ocaml-config-file-1.2-2.fc22.x86_64.rpm > ocaml-config-file.x86_64: E: no-binary > ocaml-config-file.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Should this package actually be noarch? Can you provide a rationale why, either way? > rpms/x86_64/ocaml-config-file-debuginfo-1.2-2.fc22.x86_64.rpm > ocaml-config-file-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Can't really say why this one is happening. > rpms/x86_64/ocaml-config-file-devel-1.2-2.fc22.x86_64.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > srpms/ocaml-config-file-1.2-2.fc22.src.rpm > ocaml-config-file.src:40: W: configure-without-libdir-spec > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Looks benign, but I guess it won't hurt to add an explicit --libdir=... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review