https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197471 --- Comment #10 from Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michal Srb from comment #9) > (In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #8) > > First, the main license in tonto-1.44/doc/LICENSE.txt file is not the > > Artistic license described on Fedora wiki - license texts differ. Fedora > > legal should check if this license is free software license and whether it > > is compatible with GPL or not. They will either add a new license tag or > > permit use of existing Artistic tag. > > I believe it's "Artistic 1.0 (original)" license [1], listed under "bad" > licenses in [2]. > > [1]: http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Artistic_v1.0 > [2]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Bad_Licenses The text on Fedora wiki points to http://www.perl.com/pub/a/language/misc/Artistic.html, which is not the same text as http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Artistic_v1.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review