https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194254 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- A strange one so far. :-/ > %files > %doc /usr/share/doc/libonix/README.md > %{_libdir}/libonix.so There is just the lib, no API yet! > rpm-fedora.spec https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name Even if it only says "should" there, be nice and adhere to such guidelines. > Source0: libOnix-%{version}-src.zip https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL > License: GPLv2 Nothing at all in the source tarballs refers to the licensing. > %build > cmake . http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake > $ rpm -qp --provides libOnix-1.0.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm|grep ^lib > libOnix = 1.0.0-1.fc21 > libOnix(x86-64) = 1.0.0-1.fc21 > libonix.so()(64bit) An unversioned SONAME. If anything used this lib already, the automatic dependency would be very weak. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review