https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199567 --- Comment #5 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> --- As for comment #2 I don't understand this fully. According to the GL [1] it's a must to include license file(s) in %license. However, there's nothing in the GL that the license file(s) also should be mentioned in %doc Also, that license *is* part of the package, it's just that it's a license and not a plain doc: $ rpm -qL -p ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/ExchangeIR-0.0.8.2-2.fc21.noarch.rpm /usr/share/licenses/ExchangeIR/COPYING.txt So, I don't really understand why the license also should be part of %doc. What am I missing? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review