Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-05-16 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > And... I have to ask this question: do you think we should ask for spot's (or > even FESCo's) view on the -registered package? I'm leaning towards "no, let's > finish the review", but I don't want to step on any toes... Spot makes decisions on licensing, there is no licensing issue here (the code is 100% GPL, the data isn't shipped) as for FESco, I don't think its necessary for them to get involved either. The package as a whole is ok, that we agree on. The -registered sub package is just a special compiled version. I could take all the ifdef's and change it to a runtime variable, with a cmdline switch like it is already for example for doom (prboom), would I then need to back out the runtime registered support too? Should we remove doom registered support from prboom? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review