Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 ------- Additional Comments From limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-16 08:55 EST ------- rpmlint is clean, with one exception: W: ants-level-editor no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. But, then, I don't see any docs specific to it, so never mind. Meets package naming guidelines. Spec name is good. Meets Packaging Guidelines. License was originally unspecified, but license-info includes dialog with upstream who declared it Public Domain. Spec is legible American English. Sources md5 match. Builds on i386/FC6 and in mock, as well. BRs are OK. No locales, shared libraries or static libraries. Not relocatable. Owns created directories. No listed duplicates. Permissions/defattrs correct. %clean present and correct. Good macros. Code, not content. No large docs or runtime doc deps. No headers or .pc. No -devel. No .la. .desktop is good. However, might not a .desktop for -level-editor be helpful? No ownership conflicts. Install begins by whacking buildroot. All filenames UTF-8. All MUSTS met, save the .desktop question. Also, package runs and has no wierd file deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review