https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197066 --- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata <psabata@xxxxxxxxxx> --- --- a/perl-Test-Run.spec +++ b/perl-Test-Run.spec @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ Version: 0.0302 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Extensible and object-oriented test harness for TAP scripts # lib and other code: MIT -# lib/Test/Run/Core_GplArt.pm: GPL+ or Artistic -# t/lib: GPL+ or Artistic -License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and MIT +# lib/Test/Run/Core_GplArt.pm: GPLv2+ or Artistic +# t/lib/Test (not installed): GPL+ or Artistic +License: (GPLv2+ or Artistic) and MIT Group: Development/Libraries URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Run/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SH/SHLOMIF/Test-Run-%{version}.tar.gz Well, the license of lib/Test/Run/Core_GplArt.pm is still `GPL+ or Artistic'. It's just lib/Test/Run/Straps_GplArt.pm that uses `GPLv2+ or Artistic'. The incorrect spec comment aside, even though this is acceptable, you're effectively relicensing the package now. I think the correct tag should be `(GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) and MIT'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review