[Bug 239906] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239906





------- Additional Comments From Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-05-16 06:59 EST -------
Thanks for the review.

Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Ping.spec
SRPM URL:
http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Ping-2.4.1-2.fc8.src.rpm

%changelog
* Wed May 16 2007 Remi Collet <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2.4.1-2
- From review, correct typo.
- add Requires: /bin/ping
- add simple test in %%check 

I requires /bin/ping rather than iputils after asking #fedora-devel. I don't
really prefer one solution to another. It will work even if ping gets moved to
another package.

When packaging pear stuff, most often, tests must be run after installing the
package (doesn't run in Buildroot, even with R changed to BR).

Running tests after installation allow to be more complete (need configuration
change, databse...), ex running
/usr/share/doc/php-pear-Net-Ping-2.4.1/examples/example.php.

But, of course, i agree to include test when exists and works.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]