https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179982 --- Comment #12 from Simon Farnsworth <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #11) > (In reply to Simon Farnsworth from comment #10) > > Getting closer: > > > > Must fix: > > > > * URL needs updating now that the package has been renamed for clarity. > > Should be http://docsis.sf.net not http://%{name}.sf.net > > Okay. Will be modified in next upload. > > > * Docs are duplicated in the -doc subpackage and in the main package. > > Which files do you mean? This seems to be caused by the bug in rpmbuild to > not handle individual files %{_pkgdocdir} properly when they're %doc. > I mean that everything in the -doc subpackage is also contained in the main package, causing file conflicts between the two packages. > > Personal comments: > > > > * Is "Suggests" right for the snmp subpackage? The main package looks > > fairly useless without the MIBs - it'll technically work, but you won't be > > able to encode anything. > > Okay. Changed that to Requires. Oh, and a side note; while I'm not happy with "docsis" as a package name, I have no problem with the binary that comes out of it being named "docsis". My goal is just to make sure that "yum search docsis" is clear about what the package does; binary names can be the same as upstream if that makes your life easier. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review