[Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189





------- Additional Comments From bos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-05-15 17:51 EST -------
Source RPM passes rpmlint OK, but there are problems with the binary packages:

$ rpmlint /home/bos/downloads/RPMS/x86_64/PyQt4-4.2-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
E: PyQt4 non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PyQt4/uic/pyuic.py 0644
E: PyQt4 script-without-shebang /usr/bin/pyuic4
E: PyQt4 binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PyQt4/QtDesigner.so
['/home/bos/downloads/BUILD/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.2/qpy/QtDesigner']

The first of these is a non-problem, but the second two are definitely issues. 
You can use chrpath to remove the rpath from the shared object if necessary.

I'm attaching the rpmlint warnings for the -devel package, because they're
voluminous.  Some of them can be ignored (the dependency on /usr/bin/env), but
the spurious perms should be fixed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]