https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665733 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #31 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #30) > (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #28) > > 2. Fedora 20 is the oldest supported release so the conditional really isn't > > needed, but if you're supporting older Fedora installations locally then > > let's keep it. > The freetype2 f20 conditional _is_ required to be able to support fc20: > ... > %if 0%{?fedora} > 20 > # Incompatibility: > # Fedora > 20 has /usr/include/freetype2/ > # Fedora <= 20 has /usr/include/freetype2/freetype > sed -i -e 's,freetype/,freetype2/,' src/glue/freetype.{h,cpp} > %endif > ... > The package does not build on fc20 without it, because the freetype header > location has changed in Fedora. Whoops, I read that as >= for some reason. > Anyway, with current boost, removing the bundled boost headers doesn't seem > to cause any immediate malfunction or break down. Ok sounds good, so if upstream does start using boost more extensively we stay out of trouble as far as bundling goes we just have to make sure a future boost update doesn't break things. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review