https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183193 --- Comment #3 from Taylor Braun-Jones <taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Since both bugs have dead links it's hard to compare. Here are updated links for my spec and SRPM files: http://files.braun-jones.org/ceres-solver.spec http://files.braun-jones.org/ceres-solver-1.10.0-1.el7.centos.src.rpm Since mine uses the latest 1.10 upstream release I was able to take advantage of a new build option that uses Eigen for the sparse matrix math and reduce the number of dependencies -- the only downside is that this means more restrictive licensing. See item 2 here for more info: http://ceres-solver.org/version_history.html#id1 I don't have a strong opinion either way. Since this review is slightly more up-to-date, I say go with this one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review