https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190373 --- Comment #21 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I think you have two possibilities in these cases: 1. Name it python3-livestreamer as it contains a module for python3 only. Provide livestreamer, so that one can install it with the application name. If you have multiple pythonX-livestremer, only one can provide the application name, but you have the module for several python implementations. 2. Name it livestreamer and either assume that the python3 module is not used anywhere or package it in a python3-livestreamer subpackage. I'd decide this based upon the possible usage by other packages. If nothing else uses this module, I'd probably go with route 2. If other packages (might) depend on it, route 1 should be prefered. (That's why I asked about what packages depend on this in comment #18.) As an example for an application, that right now uses python2 (without the python2-whaawmp subpackage) you could take whaawmp. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review