https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190373 --- Comment #19 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Thomas Spura from comment #18) > As you are only providing the python3-livestreamer, you should also name the > package like that. > I think in order to stay close to upstream it would also be good, if you add > a "Provides: livestreamer = %{version}-%{release}", so it can be installed > with "yum install livestreamer". See [1] how they recomment to install it on > other platforms. > > Are other packages depending on this one? > If not, you could also possibly name it just as "livestreamer". > > Lifting fedora-cvs because of the above... > > [1] http://livestreamer.tanuki.se/install.html I haven't found anything in the naming guidelines which would cover such cases naming a py3-only package. I'm maintaining some packages which are py3-only and don't mention "python" in the package name. The packages are pure userland software which include Python modules, but I don't split the modules into separate packages. However, if I would do so, other packagers could use the module packages, although currently I don't know about real use cases. Well, it is in fact a python3 module with a "binary" on top. Indeed, it would be less confusing to name it just "livestreamer", as long as no other package needs the module part. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review