[Bug 974714] Review Request: thermal_daemon - A close loop thermal monitoring and control daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974714



--- Comment #31 from Eric Griffith <EGriffith92@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Created attachment 991607
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=991607&action=edit
New spec file, please review.

Disclaimer: First time writing a spec file, tried to follow all available
guidelines. This builds, installs and works fine so i know this isn't broken
just want to make it accurate as per guidelines & assumptions.  

A handful of questions in regards to the spec file format: 

1) rpmlint complains about source0 not being a valid URL, but it rpmbuild can't
find the source if I have it correct... see my above post in regards to that
situation. 

2) %build section. The original spec file had 'autoreconf' the compilation
instructions had ./autogen.sh. Which is the correct one to use? Current spec
uses autogen.sh

3) Is a "BuildRequires: systemd" necessary or is it just redundant? 

4) Can someone link or explain the Requires(post)/(preun)/(postun), same with
%post, %preun, %postun

5) %files does every single file need to be listed here or just 'important
ones? I left out /usr/share/src, /usr/lib and a couple others.

6) Upstream name is "thermal_daemon" but I see it packaged elsewhere as
"thermald" and the binary / .service is thermald. Preference goes to...?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]