Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-14 14:46 EST ------- How about deciding upon exactly how a proper signed package would replace this package now? Theoretical Packages ==================== jss-4.2.9-7.el6 JSS for RHEL6 unsigned jss-4.2.9-7.el6.SIGNED Same thing, except with SIGNED appended to end of the Release tag. This would "win" rpmvercmp and replace the unsigned version. This package has an additional virtual provides. Provides: jss(SIGNED) That way other packages that require jss(SIGNED) can Require it by name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review