[Bug 1181725] Re-Review Request (epel5): fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181725



--- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Do we really need the re-review (that nobody seems to want to take care of)?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
says "To unretire a EPEL branch if the package is still in Fedora, no re-review
is required.". I would prefer if we could
just proceed to get the package back...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]