Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-14 13:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for the comments. > > 1) I will ask just to make sure, the README says "License: Free for any use with > your own risk!". Okay. We can regard this as public domain. > 2) Thinking about it you are right. Although "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" wi > ll not solve the problem. Lets say that we have ruby 1.9 as the standard package > and ruby 1.8 installed as ruby1.8 by a compat package. The require will pull in > ruby1.8 but the package will still be build with 1.9. I'll add the buildrequire > but if we are going to have compat packages for ruby in the future this we need > something else. Truly for ruby BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" does not prevent this package from being rebuilt by ruby 1.9...... > 3) Is it OK to rename it to README.jp (after it's converted in utf8)? Okay. > 4) I missed this somehow, I'll fix it before the next update. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review