Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-05-14 00:06 EST ------- Ok. Taking your comment #5 as basis Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. but those warnings can be ignored. + source files match upstream url 7732cf48a1593164bcf6710bda41e6c8 gammu-1.10.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + gammu.pc file present. + -devel and -libs subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gammu-libs Provides: libGammu.so.1 + Requires: /bin/sh bluez-utils libGammu.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcrypt.so.1 libcrypto.so.6 libm.so.6 libmysqlclient.so.15 libmysqlclient.so.15(libmysqlclient_15) libnsl.so.1 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) libssl.so.6 libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review