https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Mohammed Isam from comment #16) > (In reply to Jonathan Dieter from comment #14) > > Mohammad, the problem is that the spec link still points to the old spec > > file. I've downloaded the srpm and run some preliminary checks. Thanks for > > fixing the items Carlos listed, but you also have %files being listed twice > > for each subpackage because %_font_pkg automatically creates a %files > > section for a font. > > Hi Jonathan > I am a little perplexed here. If I remove the %files sections, rpmbuild > complains about finding (Installed but unpackaged files) and terminates in > error. Still, it is working with the current spec file, how is it possible? > Furthermore, when I run (rpm -qpl) on the font packages, it lists the files > correctly (with no repeated files). Should I remove the %files sections from > my spec? If yes, how to solve the rpmbuild panic error? The problem is that the manpages aren't packaged by %_font_pkg but are listed in the %files sections. I would suggest dropping both the man and info pages as they're really not necessary for a font. I checked a couple of other Fedora fonts and they don't contain man or info pages. If you remove the man and info pages, then you can also remove all of the %files sections except -common -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review