[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090



--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Mohammed Isam from comment #16)
> (In reply to Jonathan Dieter from comment #14)
> > Mohammad, the problem is that the spec link still points to the old spec
> > file.  I've downloaded the srpm and run some preliminary checks.  Thanks for
> > fixing the items Carlos listed, but you also have %files being listed twice
> > for each subpackage because %_font_pkg automatically creates a %files
> > section for a font.
> 
> Hi Jonathan
> I am a little perplexed here. If I remove the %files sections, rpmbuild
> complains about finding (Installed but unpackaged files) and terminates in
> error. Still, it is working with the current spec file, how is it possible?
> Furthermore, when I run (rpm -qpl) on the font packages, it lists the files
> correctly (with no repeated files). Should I remove the %files sections from
> my spec? If yes, how to solve the rpmbuild panic error?

The problem is that the manpages aren't packaged by %_font_pkg but are listed
in the %files sections.  I would suggest dropping both the man and info pages
as they're really not necessary for a font.  I checked a couple of other Fedora
fonts and they don't contain man or info pages.

If you remove the man and info pages, then you can also remove all of the
%files sections except -common

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]