https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185665 --- Comment #3 from Michael Adam <madam@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Folorian, (In reply to Florian "der-flo" Lehner from comment #2) > > After the package is approved, you can send an SCM Request, which can > contain f21. For more about this, please take a look at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests Thanks! I have meanwhile done it for another packages and am familiar with the procedure.. > There are a few things regarding the .spec: > > [ ] Why don't you use the source directly from sourceforge? > You can easily do this by following the instructions on > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/ > SourceURL#Sourceforge.net Thanks for the hint! That url was just not obvious from sourceforge itself... ==> fixed that, going to post an update soon. > [ ] Please document your patches. > What are they doing and why? ==> gonna follow up with that fixed > [ ] What about the license of BabyTuX? ==> gonna follow up on that > Cheers, > Florian Thanks for your review/comments! Stay tuned - Michael -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review