[Bug 1186889] Review Request: geoipupdate - Update GeoIP2 and GeoIP Legacy binary databases from MaxMind

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889



--- Comment #22 from Philip Prindeville <philipp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #21)
> Oh, I didn't notice that you're the co-maintainer. Sorry.

No worries.

> You could play with Provides and Obsoletes and join updates of GeoIP and
> geoipupdate, but is it worth the trouble? Do you need to do the split for
> F21?

Well, personally I run a few F20 machines that I've not yet had time to update
(and I'm still cringing at the thought of 'fedup' not handling /var filesystems
correctly).

And I know of a lot of web services (Apache, SpamAssassin, ProFTPD, Mimedefang,
etc) which all have GeoIP-based plugins and use geoipupdate to fetch databases
weekly. I wouldn't want to leave them all in a lurch...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]