https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889 --- Comment #14 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Philip Prindeville from comment #12) > (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #11) > > > Yes, this should be: > > > > Provides: GeoIP-update = 1.6.0 > > Obsoletes: GeoIP-update < 1.6.0 > > > > You could arguably use %{version} in the Provides: line but I think it's > > safer to stick with 1.6.0 as geoipupdate looks to have a different numbering > > scheme to GeoIP. > > Fixed. We must make sure that anyone updating from GeoIP 1.5.x to 1.6.x gets the GeoIP + geoipupdate combination, as must anyone with GeoIP updating from F-21 to F-22. People doing fresh installs on F-22 can install the two packages independently. It can be tricky to get the provides/obsoletes/requires correct for all of these cases, so they should be tested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review