Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235731 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx 2007-05-12 12:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > 1. MUSTFIX: > > This spec doesn't apply $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. It compiles and places its files > directly into */BUILD. > > One way to approach this: > %setup -c -T Done. > > 2. Is there an agreement with the glibc developers upon using the name > libmalloc.*? To me, this name appears as too general. Renamed. > 3. http://mr.himki.net/index-alloc.html109 is in a Cyrillan written language > (Russian?). An English version would be helpful, because except of the source > code there doesn't seem to be any other documentation. OK, I'll try to add something more valuable docs. > 4. The source file seems to be intended to be used as a preloaded module: > I am not sure if packaging it as a library is a wise decision. Hmmm. Are any recomendations about handling of preloaded libraries? http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/openbsd-malloc.spec http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/openbsd-malloc-0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review