https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171129 --- Comment #16 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmavrogi@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Mattias Ellert from comment #15) > It is mostly OK. But... > > Obsoleting a package that continues to exist in the destribution is a > packaging bug. (See today's notification on devel@xxxxxxxx.o about obsoleted > packages still remaining in the repos and the reqest to the maintainers to > fix it.) > > If you introduce an Obsoletes, there must exist a plan to remove the > obsoleted package. Introducing an Obsoletes against a package that is > planning to stay in the distribution is not really an Obsoletes but rather a > very aggressive version of a Conflicts, and therefore not allowed. [...] > If you are unable to make an agreement with the maintainer of > radiusclient-ng at this time, you can if you wish do option D first and then > change to A, B or C at a later point in time when an agreement has been > reached. > If you have been trying to contact the maintainer of radiusclient-ng without > success, then follow the procedure outlined in the Policy for Non-responsive > Maintainers: I will not. I don't want to delay the freeradius-client library for that issue to be resolved. I'll remove the utils part of the freeradius-client. Would that be ok with you? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review